things on my mind. i received for an xmas gift rolling stone cover to cover. this is an searchable digital archive of fourty years of rolling stone. issues 1 thru 1026. out of all of those issues the moody blues are mentioned only twenty-one times. thats interviews and reviews. all of the reviews are negative,all of the interviews are not much better. why does rolling stone hate the moody blues? it looks like a personal vendetta against the moodies. why? any comments are welcome. i highly reccomend wolfgangs vault for live concerts both free and to buy.only issue is no moody blues. well i have been receving rolling stone in my email and am finding it very much like entertainment mags,us,people etc.at one time the rolling stone was very respectable,a sorce of good writing on various subjects and covering rock-n-roll in an manner that brought intelegence to the format.i have recently read their top 500 songs of all time.although there is a lot of great music listed i feel that history is being rewritten.after reading the rs versions of several of the older groups histories i find this to be very true.who does rs think they are that they can change the past in to an totally different world.we were there!we remember!rolling stone has become a totally offensive part of music history.the people responsable at rs need to go back and read their own mag.the old rs was a great part of the past music history and there is a huge amount of truth in its past issues.now and for a long time all rs has been is an outlet for special intrests.nothing they print can be taken for truth.even the music reviews are bought and paid for.another thing that i find so wrong about all of this is younger readers that read this mag will think they are reading the way it is.this is a disservice to everyone of us that have lived and been a part of the past and to all that will learn about the past through rollingstones slanted version.rollingstone you offend!